Acts 10 (Bible Study) (Peter Cornelius)

Acts 10: Cornelius
Kelvin Burke
 
 

Introduction

In Acts 9:32-11:18 Luke turns to Peter. Paul had to be converted to Christ but Peter needed to be converted in his thinking, to see that the gospel of grace could break down cultural and racial barriers. Peter’s “conversion” is as important as Cornelius’s in these chapters.

1. Acts 9:32-42. Why do you think Luke includes these two miracles as an introduction to the longer account of Cornelius’ conversion?

This is a valid question, because all indications are that the apostles did “many miraculous signs and wonders” (2:43). So if acts were many and varied, why did Luke select these two to reintroduce us to Peter (who has been missing from the narrative since the middle of chapter 5).

These 2 miracles are parallels to two of Jesus’ miracles, and similar to the miracles that authenticated the ministries of Elijah and Elisha (cf.1 Kings 17:17-24; 2 Kings 4:32-37). The word “authenticated” is the key. For Paul himself pointed to his miracles as being “the things that mark an apostle” (2 Cor.12:12). Paul was saying here that his miracles were done upon the same pattern and the same power as Jesus’ miracles — and this authenticated him as an apostle whose message was one of divine revelation. Luke then shows us these two miracles not only because they are wonderful and encouraging, but because they show that he was a true apostle. This sets up his pronouncement about the salvation of the Gentiles (in Acts 10-11) as authoritative.

The first miracle, the healing of Aeneas the paralytic, is very reminiscent of Jesus healing of the paralytic in Capernaum (Mark 2:1-12; Matt.9:1-8). Jesus says, “Get up, take your mat…” (Matt.9:6) and Peter says, “Get up and tidy up your mat…” (9:34) On the other hand, the raising of Tabitha has echoes of Jesus’ raising of Jairus’ daughter from the dead in Mark 5. Jesus said, “Talitha (little girl), get up” (Mark 5:41), and here Peter says, “Tabitha, get up” (9:40). These parallels to Jesus’ miracles are no accident. Luke chose them because they show (as Peter himself says in 9:34) that Jesus himself is healing people through Peter (cf. “Aeneas… Jesus heals you”).
Notice also that before he heals Tabitha “he got down on his knees and prayed.” (9:40) Both miracles show that he is not healing in his own power (as Jesus did) but is relying on the pattern and power of Christ himself.

2. Acts 10:1-8, 22, 34-35. Cornelius is an example of a “good man” without the gospel. What does Acts 10 teach us about such a person?

Cornelius was one of those Gentiles called “God-fearers” (see Acts 13:16, 26). Who were they?
“A proselyte was a Gentile who undertook to keep the Jewish law it its entirety and was admitted into full fellowship with the people of Israel by a three-fold rite:

(1) circumcision for male proselytes,
(2) a purificatory self-baptism in the presence of witnesses, and
(3) the offering of a sacrifice… Many Gentiles in those days, while not prepared to enter the Jewish community as full proselytes, were attracted by the simple monotheism of Jewish… worship and by the ethical standards of the Jewish way of life…” (F.F.Bruce, The Book of the Acts, p.64, 216)

First, Cornelius respected God. We can infer from the text that Cornelius, a) prayed to the one God of Israel (v.2) (b) obeyed the general moral law of God (v22 – “righteous”; v.35 – “do what is right”), and c) was kind to the poor (v2 – “gave generously to those in need”). He both respected and prayed to God and lived a moral life in general. He was by no means a Christian, having heard nothing yet about Jesus Christ. He was not a Jew, he has probably learned things about God from them, things he accepted/honoured He was the classic “good non- Christian” lived a good, just and generous life.

Second, God respected Cornelius! Two statements are very strong, even startling. First, v.4 – “your prayers and gifts to the poor have come up as a memorial offering — [mnemosymos] — before God.” The Greek word is used in the Greek translation of the Old Testament to refer to the burnt offering (cf.Lev.2:2), which was not a sacrifice for sin, but an offering of gratitude to God. Second, in v.35, Peter says (referring to Cornelius) “[God] accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right”. This means that Cornelius “lived up to the light that he had” — i.e. what he did know about God he honoured. All he knew was that God was great and worthy of obedience and respect and gratitude. So he gave it. And God in turn shows Cornelius a certain regard.

The nature of this “regard” is extremely interesting, and we must adopt a very carefully balanced approach here. Some read the word “accept” as meaning that people like Cornelius are saved — accepted in the full sense of being “justified” (Rom.3:21ff). But that not only contradicts the rest of the Bible, but the rest of Acts (see 4:12) and even the rest of this story — for if Cornelius is saved, why does Peter need to come to him and preach the gospel to him? On the other hand, many Christians seem to regard all non-Christians as equally despicable. Here, however we see God showing some kind of regard and respect for a man who does not have enough spiritual knowledge to be saved, but who is honouring all the spiritual knowledge he has. Therefore, Cornelius is a “seeker” (cf.I Cor.14:24, where “one who does not understand” means “a seeker after more knowledge; an inquirer”).

Third, Cornelius was not saved.  Cornelius, despite all his goodness and desire for God, did not have “life”. 11:18 tells us that only after hearing the gospel was he granted life — i.e. eternal life. Before, he was a “nice” person, not a “new” person. To be born again, First, he had to repent (11:18). Repentance of “working” for his salvation (Rom.4:5). Second, he had to believe in Jesus Christ, person and work (Acts 15:7). “Saved” (11:14), means he had his sins forgiven (10:43) and receive the Holy Spirit (10:45).

3. Acts 10:9-23. How does God break Peter’s cultural prejudices?

The fact that God has to send multiple, strong, supernatural signs to Peter, in order to get him to even visit a Gentile — shows how strong racial prejudices were between Jew and Gentile.

“It is difficult for us to grasp the impassable gulf which yawned in those days between the Jews on the one hand and the Gentiles on the other. Not that the Old Testament countenanced such a divide… it affirmed that God had a purpose for [the Gentiles]. By choosing and blessing [the Jews] he intended to bless all the families of the earth (Gen.12:1-4)… The tragedy was that Israel twisted the doctrine of election into one of favouritism filled with racial pride and hatred. They called the Gentiles ‘dogs’, and developed traditions that kept them apart. No orthodox Jew would ever enter the home of a Gentile ...all familiar intercourse with Gentiles was forbidden…” (Stott, p.185)

The Jewish ceremonial laws of clean and unclean foods and garments and practices were God’s “visual aid” to demonstrate that people were sinful, that they could not just “come in” to God’s presence, that he was a Holy God, and that people needed to keep separate from sin and evil. In fact, the clean- unclean laws are really impossible to keep completely — which was also God’s way of showing people that they could never cleanse themselves from sin. Over the centuries, the clean-unclean laws were twisted into a way of works-righteousness and as a way to keep separate from other nations! Therefore God has to send three great signs to even get Peter to go to Cornelius.

First, the vision God sends is of a sheet containing a mixture of animals, many of which were unclean. (See Leviticus 11). Because the sheet contained “all kinds” (v.12) of animals, the command to “kill and eat” (v.13) was to contradict the OT ceremonial law. This would have offended Peter’s conscience and disgusted him emotionally. He says so in v.14 but three times God repeats “do not call anything impure that God has made clean” (v.15-16). The vision alone is insufficient to help Peter. He doesn’t get it (v.17).

Second, the Holy Spirit commands him to go with the men who appear at his door (v19-20). Third, he hears from the men that an angel had appeared to a Gentile centurion, Cornelius, directing him to summon Peter.
These three things together were sufficient to get Peter to go to the house of an unclean Gentile.

4. Acts 10:34-48. How does v34-35 (and his presentation of the gospel) show that Peter now understands the meaning of the vision? What is the meaning of the vision?

God is saying in the vision: “even those things that are defiled and unfit for my presence I can make clean and fit for my presence. There is no being that I cannot make clean.” Acts 10:13-15 The key word is “make”. Peter had assumed that some things were inherently clean and other things inherently unclean. God is introducing a new concept — that salvation is not a matter of pedigree or even of achievement, but is the result of the action of God. So nothing is inherently and permanently unclean. The Gentiles, who were ceremonially unclean, were like the unclean animals in the sheet, mixed in with the “clean” Jews  When God cleanses someone from sin, then they are equal with anyone else “Now I realize… God does not show favouritism” (10:34) means “now I see that external criteria such as appearance, race, nationality, class, gender make not a whit of difference for whether I am loved and justified by God”. The religion of good works will give some people the right to feel superior to others. But the gospel of grace means that no saved person can feel superior to another saved person, all saved by grace alone.

We looked at 10:34-35 above and said that this cannot mean that Cornelius was saved apart from Christ. Indeed, Peter shows him that only through Christ will his sins be forgiven (10:43). But v.34-25 means that Peter finally sees that nationality and race makes no difference.

5. Acts10:44-11:18. What is the final (4th) sign given by God to Peter that the gospel is for the Gentiles? How do our converts teach us — as Cornelius taught Peter?

 We said that the first three signs to Peter were the vision, the word of the spirit, and the message from the angel to Cornelius. Now finally, Peter sees with his very eyes, the 4th sign.  The Spirit baptises the Gentiles who believed (v.44-47). He was not even finished with his sermon (v.44) when those who “heard the message” (i.e. believed) received the spirit. Not everyone who received an anointing from the Holy Spirit speaks in tongues (eg 4:31). But in this case, God wanted to show Peter beyond a doubt that the Gentiles were full members of the church, so he sent the spirit in such a way that it resembled the Day of Pentecost. So Peter says, “the Holy Spirit came on them as he had come on us at the beginning” (11:15). In other words, this was a Gentile Pentecost. Just as on the original Pentecost God had given special dramatic manifestations to assure everyone of his purpose, so he sent the Spirit in a powerful way here. Cornelius and the household experienced tremendous joy and love and power, and they began to praise God and articulate his glory — it was like Acts 2. Of course, not everyone gets converted like this! (Many people get converted very quietly. It is often not even possible until later to know that you were converted at a particular time.) But God sent this power to deliver the last “hammer blow” to the stubbornness and doubt of Peter.

One of the lessons we learn here is that we must not only teach our converts but learn from them. Clearly, Peter was as affected by Cornelius as Cornelius by Peter! And that is a wonder that is often seen. If we win a person to Christ, often that person will teach us many things. a) Often the person shows us how little faith we have — especially if the new convert is someone we consider a “hard case”. When such come to Christ, it really humbles us that we had such low expectations. b) Often the person can also show us new things about the faith, especially if the person is of a different culture or personality from ours.

New converts can often see things in the Bible we have been blind to because their experience and background leads them to ask God questions that we aren’t even asking. The Peter-Cornelius story means we must not be too authoritarian or proud, but should be open and willing to learn from new believers.


Previous
Previous

Acts 11 (Bible Study) (Barnabus)

Next
Next

Acts 9 (Bible Study) (Paul)