Acts 13 (Bible Study) - Paul Preaches

Acts 13
Kelvin Burke
 
 

Introduction

Luke shows us that the gospel is a living word. The Good News is growing and multiplying under its own power (Acts 6:7; 12:24; 19:20). It has progressed according to the pattern Jesus laid down in Acts 1:8 - to go “Jerusalem, Samaria, the ends of the earth”.
In Acts 2-6 the gospel spreading in Jerusalem (eg Acts 6:7 “so the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly”).
In Acts 7-8 the gospel broke through to non-Jews. First, via Stephen (his theology and death) and Phillip (by his mission to Samaria). The gospel spread from Jerusalem to - the Samaritans and the Ethiopians.
In Acts 10-12, through the conversion of Cornelius and the new church in Antioch, we saw the gospel show its power not only to enter any and every culture and class, but to also unite Christians with a bond deeper than any other. Christianity is truly supernatural and trans-cultural. To become a Christian, a Greek does not have to become a Jew. (eg Acts 12:24, “But the word of God continued to increase and spread”).
The stage is set for the final stage, to spread geographically to “the ends of the earth”. Beginning with the church of Antioch. Paul and Barnabus had returned from taking an offering to Jerusalem (12:25,11:29)

1.Acts 13:1-3. The Antioch fellowship was the first missionary-sending body. What led them to this? Note the role of a) their leadership, b) their routines, c) the Holy Spirit

Answer: Antioch was the first missionary-sending church. The evangelistic efforts in Samaria and Antioch were not strategically planned by the Jerusalem church. Christians fleeing persecution simply shared their faith by friendship with the people around them in their new cities (Acts 8:1-4 & 11:19-20). How did the church in Antioch receive the insight to begin the worldwide missionary project?

a) Their leadership make-up. The church at Antioch had a council of leaders (like elders) who were “prophets and teachers”. NB the diversity Barnabus was a Cypriot Jew (4:36). Simeon was called “Niger” (black African). Lucian was from “Cyrene” (North Africa). A Cyrenian evangelist who came to Antioch (11:20). Manaen, a relative of Herod Antipas, of royal status. And Saul, a Jew an “academic”. The ‘elders’ reflected the multi-class & -cultural make-up of the church. Such a group can agree on common goals and is a more creative than a group of similar people. Mission was born of this group.

b) Their routines. Acts 13:2 “while they were worshipping the Lord and fasting.” It implies that it wasn’t a special season of prayer, nor were they deliberately planning for missions. Their routine of worship and seeking God’s presence was their norm. Acts 13:1 says the whole church along with the leaders were praying i.e. this prayer time was not just for the 5 prophet/ teachers. Periods of  worship, fasting, and seeking God’s presence were normal. This is the kind of church that God reveals himself to.

c) The Holy Spirit. Luke does not say how the Holy Spirit showed the church that he wanted Paul and Barnabus to become missionaries. Perhaps a prophecy through a member of the church (cf.11:28). “Set apart for me Barnabus and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” (v.2) The message does not say what countries to go. Only to send the two missionaries out. The Holy Spirit reveals one step at a time.

d) Finally, in v3 they again fasted and prayed some more until they “layed their hands on them”. The laying on of hands is identifying with them. The whole church was confirming and agreeing that the Holy Spirit had truly called them and they prayed for the Spirit’s empowering.
In response to the Spirit’s leading some members, the whole group prayed and confirmed it.

 

2. Acts 13:1-3. What can we learn in church today, from this incident?

We learn that we are not to be self-accredited, eg. “God told me this” but get confirmation from other Christians. On the other hand, our church isn’t a bureaucracy where decisions are made through committees. We must seek to hear the Holy Spirit in the fellowship. Then seek confirmation of what we have heard together. This avoids individualism and institutionalism.

3.  Acts 13:6-12. Why was Paul so forceful with Elymas?
Why was the supernatural judgement on Elymas appropriate?

Paul’s condemnation was very severe. He plays on the Elymas’ proper name, “Bar-Jesus” which means “son of salvation”, and says, “you are a child of the devil” v10. He was struck blind in judgement. Luke used “mist & darkness,” medical terms for blindness (Stott, p.220). The blindness is “for a time”. Paul’s forcefulness is due to a) the public nature of Elymas’s opposition to the gospel & b) the openness of the proconsul Sergius Paulus to the gospel. Paul therefore acted decisively.

The judgement is appropriate in two ways. First, it had revelational value. A perfect illustration that if we deny the light (the truth) that we have, we will become spiritually blind. Paul knows his blindness showed him his spiritual blindness (Acts 9). Second, the judgment had redemptive value. It was temporary. If Elymas “got the point” it could have been the way for him to find God.

We must be willing to speak out clearly, especially when there is public opposition to the gospel that could harm an open person. We should be opposing people only in order to redeem them

4. Acts 13:13-41. Read Paul’s gospel presentation. What do you know about the audience, from his sermon detail? What is his case that Christianity is true in v16-25,31? What is the heart of Christianity in v26-37? How should they respond in v38-41?

Each presentation of the gospel in Acts has four basic components: (a) the gospel witnesses (credibility), (b) the gospel promises (relevance for our needs), (c) the gospel events (what Jesus has done), (d) the gospel conditions (how to appropriate it for oneself). Luke provides 3 summaries of Paul’s preaching. Here in Acts 13, we see him communicating to Jews and Gentile God-fearers. In Acts 14, we hear his message to non-educated pagans, and in Acts 17, we have his sermon to philosophers and educated pagans. It is helpful to see the different ways that knowing the audience shapes the way Paul both presents and argues for the gospel.

The audience: In any synagogue outside of Judea, there would have been a combination of Jews and Gentile “God-fearers”, some of whom had been circumcised and were full converts to Judaism, and others of which (like Cornelius) had adopted monotheism and Biblical morality in general ways, but had not converted. His audience is explicitly named in v.16. But it is deduced by the way that the gospel is presented and defended. Anyone in the synagogue respected the authority of the Jewish Scriptures, the Bible (OT). That is evident in his opening “argument” in v16-25 - Paul makes his case for the truth of Christianity, and throughout he assumes that his audience already trusts the Bible. So his arguments come from the Scripture.

The gospel witnesses: Paul makes his case for Christianity by appealing (a) to two authorities (the Scripture and John Baptist), (b) to eye-witness evidence. Throughout v16-25 Paul makes his case for Christianity by stressing how God has always taken the initiative of grace in his relationship with his people. God “chose” the Jewish patriarchs (v.17). He patiently “endured” them (v.18). He “gave” them all their leaders and deliverers — first Moses (v.17), then the judges, prophets, kings (v.20), especially David, the greatest deliverer of all. He shows that God’s favour has never been earned, always been graciously given, and always mediated through great leaders who saved the people by God’s power. When he gets to David, he jumps to Jesus and points to him as David’s son (v.23), the “promised” One that had been foretold. Finally he notes that John the Baptist accredited Jesus as the Messiah.

He then says the Bible has predicted a great Saviour, who John the Baptist recognised as Jesus.

Finally, in v.31, he refers to the eyewitnesses to the resurrection of Christ (as Peter did).
So Paul’s case for the gospel is:
a) Jesus life and death fits the Scripture’s prediction of the Messiah,
b) the greatest prophet, John the Baptist, recognized Jesus as the Messiah, and
c) we have evidence for the reality and truth of the bodily resurrection of Christ.
It is important to see that the apostles never proclaimed the gospel by saying, “just believe because I told you so” or “just believe because it will feel wonderful”. They made a reasonable argument for the truth of the gospel.


Previous
Previous

Acts 14 (Bible Study) - Paul’s Approach

Next
Next

Acts 11 (Bible Study) (Barnabus)