Acts 16 (Bible Study) - (3 Conversions)

Acts 16
Kelvin Burke
 
 

Introduction

Paul’s second missionary journey was his greatest. It was to main cities of 3 Roman provinces, Macedonia, Achaia, Asia. Paul’s urban-centric missionary strategy was crucial. Planting a church in each city like Phillippi, Thessalonica, and Berea - Macedonian cities.

1. Acts 16:1, 6-10. Look at a map to see how unusual a route this is. a) On the basis of Acts, what are the ways that the Holy Spirit may have been guiding them away from these provinces?
b) What does this incident tell us about how God will guide us?

a) How may the Holy Spirit have been guiding them?
It can be seen from the map that Paul and company returned to where they had been on the first journey; Pisidian Antioch, Lystra, and Derbe (Acts16:1). It would be natural to go north to Asia, Mysia, or Bithynia. But they were “kept by the Holy Spirit” from preaching in those regions. They had to journey a long way before they were allowed to stop and minister. The text does not say how the Holy Spirit dissuaded them. In Acts 11:28 it was by word of knowledge or revelation to a person. In Acts 15:28 it was by discussion and group consensus. In Acts 13:1ff it was by group prayer. Why they did not go north may have been a) through an illness or a legal ban or b) through reasoning or conviction in prayer, or c) through a a lack of agreement within the group, or d) through a miraculous circumstance such as a prophecy or dream or vision. All methods of the Holy Spirit. Since it was not specified it was probably ordinary rather than extraordinary otherwise Luke would have recorded the miracle or vision. Luke doews however record Paul’s dream of a man of Macedonia calling him to preach there.

NB A “no” is an act of guidance. In addition, we now have letters 1 & 2 Thessalonians , Ephesians and Corinthians 1 & 2. Note the pronoun change from “they” to “we” implies that they picked up Luke at Troas. Summary: God’s guidance is negative as well as positive, closed and open doors.

2. Acts 16:11-15. What do we know about Lydia and how she was truly converted?

Note: “a place of prayer… on the Sabbath” indicates that these were Jews and God-fearing Gentiles who met weekly for worship, but that there were not enough of them to have an official synagogue. So what Paul and his friends went to was, essentially, a synagogue service of teaching/discussion of God’s Word.

First, we learn that Lydia was a businesswoman, a dealer in dyed cloth. From Thyatira, a place known for its dyes (an ancient inscription in that place refers to a guild or association of dyers that was centred in that city).  She was a dyer or a trader networking in her home city. Second, she was a “worshipper of God” (v.14) a convert to Judaism (revered the Old Testament and worshipped God.

Notice the statement about becoming a Christian. “Whose heart the Lord opened to give heed to the things that were spoken by Paul” (v14 ASV). But God reached Lydia through the preaching of the word by Paul. Her response was only possible because her heart was opened by God. Without Holy Spirit intervention, the listeners’ hearts are closed, and the speakers words are ineffective. Read Acts 13:44, where we are told that “as many as were appointed to eternal life believed” — not that “as many as believed were appointed to eternal life”. It is the same with Lydia. Her heart was not opened because she responded to the gospel — she responded to the gospel because her heart was opened.

Notice also the pathway to faith:
a) She believed the gospel “responded to Paul’s message” (v.14). The gospel was coherent, attractive, convicting.
b) She brought her family (oikos) to the Lord. Acts 16:15. Oikos means her servants, her children, if she was married; her husband. Perhaps, she led other adult members of her household network to Christ as well.
c) Her home became a centre of ministry. She invited the missionary team to live and operate out of her home. It became a house church. Once your heart is opened to God, your resources: home wallet, possessions become open as well.

3. Read Acts 16:16-19. Contrast the slave-girl with Lydia and especially Paul’s ministry to each. What is Luke trying to show us?

The contrast between the businesswoman, Lydia and the slave girl could not be greater. “They differ so much from one another that [Luke] may have deliberately selected them to show how Jesus’s name changed the most diverse types. (FF Bruce, p.332). The girl “had a spirit by which she predicted the future” (v16) NB the Greek she “had the spirit of python.” A “pythoness” was a person who was possessed by the spirit of the python which guarded the mythic temple of Apollo and the Delphic oracle. Greeks named them “ventriloquists” (see Bruce, p.332 n.35). They made clairvoyant predictions and proclaimed prophecies and gnomic utterances in strange and foreign voices. Society considered them inspired by Apollo and the python, people paid the masters of this slave girl for consultations. And “she earned a great deal of money for her owners by fortune-telling” v16).

So the contrast between Lydia and the girl was thus: Lydia is a respectable business woman, a pillar of the community; the slave girl is virtually an item in a freak show. Lydia is a very religious person who loved and knew the Bible; but the slave girl is starved of any  knowledge of the truth - a marginalized non-person, without dignity, powerless, without even any self-control. Whereas Lydia has a moderate amount of power, both social and economic. F. F. Bruce said, the gospel reaches and transforms every person. It is not only for the cultured and the able, nor is it only for the helpless and the broken.

Paul ministers differently to the two women. Paul recognises her as demon-possessed, and exploited by her human masters. In one stroke Paul breaks the power that both have over her. How?
Over several days we are told that Paul grew “troubled” (v18), i.e. grieved and distressed for her. Finally, he publicly challenged the demon in the name of Jesus, and it came out of her. Even her masters saw she had new peace of mind. She became calm and “normal” - they became mad!

Lydia had come to Christ quietly, but the slave girl very noisily! Lydia had come to Christ in a Bible study but the slave girl met Christ through a powerful encounter. To Lydia, Jesus was presented as the Messiah of Israel; to the slave girl, he was presented as the bondage-breaker, all-powerful liberator. This shows us - that that Jesus is also the liberator for Lydia, and he is also the fulfiller of the law for the slave-girl — but in their initial encounter, each was confronted with a different feature of Jesus glory. We need to be flexible when presenting the gospel. Consider how different a person’s problems, needs, and issues can be! The gospel is as much for “nice” as for broken people.

4. Read Acts 16:19-40. a) What led the jailer to believe?
b) Compare his worldview with that of Lydia and the girl.
c) How does Paul lead him to Christ?
d) Why does Paul insist on a public apology v.37?

Paul and Silas found themselves in jail because the masters of the slave-girl were furious that their income lost. They cleverly aroused the people’s racist attitudes by talking about these “Jews” polluting the culture of “us Romans”. So, they were imprisoned. It leads to the conversion of the Phillipian jailer.

a) What led him to seek Christ?
First, Paul and Silas, who would have been bruised and bleeding, were praying and singing hymns to God at midnight (v.25) – their testimony was key. The jailer (v.25) saw how Christianity strengthens you to face the worst that life can send.
Second, when the earthquake came, and all were unchained, the jailer was shocked to find that Paul and Silas had restrained the inmates. By doing so, they had saved his life. This act of service to him humbled him, and the view of their influence (over the prisoners) probably awed him as well. This led him to ask, “what must I do to be saved?” Sum: he was impressed with their character and helped by them

b) Compare his pre-Christian spiritual condition.
The jailer was somewhere between the conditions of Lydia and the Pythoness. He wasn’t a moral, Bible studying person, but neither was he out of control and broken. He didn’t come calmly, like Lydia, during a Bible study. Neither was he challenged by the evangelists like the girl. When he asked “what must I do to be saved?” he would not have known very much about “salvation” (unlike Lydia). He was simply aware that these men had a power and character and peace that he lacked and he wanted.

c) How Paul led him to Christ.
First, Paul summarized the gospel: “believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your family” v.31. (Meaning this is not just for you, but for your whole family.) Second, Paul “then… spoke the word of the Lord to him…” (v.32). A brief gospel summary was not enough. Third, Paul brought the word to the family! This is wise because, if an individual converts without the rest of the family, it can lead to division and alienatio. Also, it shows that people tend to come to Christ via relationships.
Fourth, they were baptised when they believed (v.33). Obviously Paul thought it important to let the people show their commitment to Christ quickly. This closure results in wonderful joy (v.34).

d) The public apology.
It is not like Paul promote himself or to try to humiliate an opponent. Rather, “this may have been extremely important for the freedom of the church he left behind” (Triton, in Stott, p.268).
It was illegal to beat and imprison a Roman citizen without a trial. The magistrates knew now that Paul could appeal and create great trouble for them. By showing them this power he had over them, he was probably guaranteeing that his new church at Philippi would not be harassed.

There were many conversions at Philippi but Luke deliberately chose these three.

As John Stott says, “racially, socially, and psychologically they were worlds apart. Yet all three were changed by the same gospel and were welcomed into the same church.” (p.268). (a) Racially — Lydia was a foreigner from Asia Minor, the slave-girl probably native Greek,and the jailer probably a Roman. (b) Socially — Lydia wealthy, the slave girl was a non-person socially, and the jailer a civil servant. (c) Psychologically/mentally — Lydia was very wise and “together”, the slave-girl was deranged, while the jailer was probably a retired soldier, a “working man”. (d) “Felt needs” — Lydia’s was probably more intellectual, responding to a dissatisfaction with her view of the world and meaning in life (after all, she had everything else — self-esteem, success, a family). Paul responded with gentle discussion. The slave-girl’s need was deep and emotional. She was an addict with a completely broken life. And Paul responded with a word of command. The jailer’s sense of need was more acute than Lydia’s and yet less so than the slave-girl’s. He seemed to realize that “he didn’t have what it takes” to face life. And Paul responded to this man of action (probably not an intellectual) with a fairly direct presentation and then he called him to a decision.

What is most surprising (maybe deliberate) is that these three persons were opposite to what a Jewish male like Paul would have been. In fact, every Jewish head of a house would rise in the morning and thank God (in a very typical and common prayer) that he was not born a Gentile, a woman, or a slave. Yet here were these three kinds of people all now united with Paul as brothers and sisters, and now the new foundation of the new church! It is noteworthy that Luke ends the story referring to all the new Christians as their “brethren” (v.40). How important it is to show the world that through Christ people can become brothers and sisters who, outside the church, cannot even get along.


Previous
Previous

Acts 17 (Bible Study) - (Greece) (Copy)

Next
Next

Acts 14 (Bible Study) - Paul’s Approach