Acts 6 (Bible Study) (Stephen)

Acts 6
Kelvin Burke
 
 

Introduction to Stephen

Stephen is the beginning of a new chapter in the history of the church. In Acts 1-5 we had the history of the Jerusalem church (Jewish). Now, God prepares the church for ‘the ends of the earth.’ Stephen's message shows an awareness that the gospel is for all, and his death begins a persecution that forces Christianity out into all the world. Stephen's message and death also had a great impact on Saul (Paul), who would be the Apostle to the Gentiles and lead God's global mission.

 

‘We have an advocate with the Father, one who speaks in our defence: Jesus Christ the Righteous One.’ 1 John 2:1

 

1. Acts 6:8-15. This passage tells us about outstanding features of Stephen’s ministry and why it was effective.

a) First, he had a firm and clear grasp of the gospel of grace. Acts 6:13 “This fellow never stops speaking… against the law.” (v.13) Stephen was proclaiming that we are saved by grace, not by keeping the law.

b) Second, he had remarkable skill in sharing this gospel. We are told that his opponents “could not stand up against his wisdom or the Spirit by whom he spoke” (v.10). This means that in open, public debate, Stephen always “won” for two reasons. On the one hand his reasoning/answers were compelling (“the wisdom”). Secondly, there was a spirit of confidence and power about him that all could see (“the Spirit by whom he spoke”). This means our non-verbal presence (tone of joy, boldness, yet loving sensitivity) is as VIP as our verbal (logic, illustration, brevity).
c)  Third, he was full of both “grace and power” (6v.8). These are characteristics that seem opposed to each other. Stephen has the Spirit (6:6) of Christ, who is both a Lion and a Lamb (Rev.5:5-6). Only the Spirit produces humble-boldness. Stephen knew the word and the Spirit shone from him when he spoke  (6v15) He was a man who was overflowing with God.  The gospel tells us we are helpless sinners (creating humility) but we are accepted in Christ (creating a boldness). Thus it produces both grace and power.  In short, Stephen knew the gospel and the unique character that the word produces shone out in his demeanour when he spoke. Thus we see that before his final sermon, “his face was like the face of an angel” (v15).  He was a man who was just overflowing with God. He was “full”. Whenever he spoke, his joy and deep sense of the gospel’s richness was obvious to anyone looking at him.

2.  Acts 6:13-14. Summarise Stephen’s message from his accusers. How does the gospel change the way we look at the temple and the law? Why is it significant that the future apostle Paul listened to this Stephanic gospel presentation (8:1)?

The charge against Stephen was that he was preaching that Jesus made the temple obsolete, and that Jesus also made the law of Moses obsolete. Clearly, this was alarming to the religious leaders of Israel.

Jesus did teach that he made both the temple and the law of Moses obsolete. He claimed to replace the temple (John 2:18-19)- one of the accusations that led to his execution (Mark 14:58). When he died, God ripped the veil in the temple to show that Jesus was right (Mark 15:38).

Jesus also said that the Mosaic ceremonial laws were obsolete in him. The dietary laws and the various customs that made someone “clean” for entering the temple were merely symbolic methods to show worshippers that they needed spiritual cleansing to go in to a holy God. But Jesus said that these external rituals could not make someone clean (Mark 7:1-20). But it is Jesus who makes us “clean” by his works and efforts, not by ours (John 1:12).

In Peter’s preaching of the gospel, up until now, this theme of works-v- faith has been muted. Stephen evidently pressed home that Jesus is our temple and Jesus is our “cleanness” before God. Jesus had fulfilled the law, so we were not saved through law-keeping. “What Jesus taught, then, was that the temple and the law would be superseded… that they would find their God-intended fulfilment in him… Jesus was the replacement of the temple and the fulfilment of the law.” (Stott, The Message of Acts, p.129.) This kind of language is always interpreted as law-lessness by religious people when they first hear it. No wonder it got Stephen killed.

It is interesting that Stephen’s face shone radiantly (6:15) just as Moses’ face shone when he came down from Mt.Sinai with the law (Exodus 34:29). Was this God’s way to show that Stephen’s message of the gospel was not dishonouring to the law but the very message of God? Is it possible that Paul had Stephen and Moses in mind when he said that the giving of the law came with such glory that no one could look upon Moses’ brightness (II Cor.3:7-8) but that the gospel message brings an even greater radiance (II Cor.3:9-11)?

The themes that Stephen hits on were developed by Paul. Probably, “Saul”, never forgot that sermon. Stephen had a short ministry, but through his impact on Paul, he influenced millions. We must remember, as we minister, that we might reach someone who will be much more productive for Christ than we.

3.         7:1-50. How does Stephen’s very long speech answer the original question (v.1)? How does each section about Abraham, Joseph, Moses, and Solomon advance his basic argument? How does he adapt his argument to the premises and nature of his audience?

Stephen’s speech is very long, and most of it does not seem to be answering the question! The question is: “are these charges true — do you teach that the temple is unnecessary?” (7:1; cf. 6:13-14). But the argument of Stephen is this: God is a living god, not confined to a building. His glory presence is available without travelling to Jerusalem to a building. God is on the move!

NB he begins by addressing them as “brothers and fathers” (v.2) and by identifying heavily with them. He does not refer to Jesus at all until the end. Stephen uses the teaching of the OT to show that the temple must point beyond itself. He shows that for Abraham, for Moses, and for others, it was possible to come into the presence of God. He quotes Isaiah. In other words, he seeks to say, “Your own authorities, prophets and law show that the temple-building is not the ultimate way to meet God. It is only a copy of a pattern, an object lesson to teach us. It is not final.” He uses only the authorities they subscribe to. A powerful argument.

The structure of Stephen’s speech is as follows, and he makes this argument at each place.

Acts 7:2-8 Covers Abraham up to the Patriarchal Age. Long before there was a Holy Place or a temple, God visited Abraham in a pagan land and sent him out. He finally brought him to the land of Israel, but he never received “even a foot of ground” (Acts7:.5) there. God was not confined to Israel.

Acts 7:9-19 Covers Joseph up to the exodus. Joseph was sold into slavery in a pagan land, but again “God was with him” (v.9). God is not confined to Israel.

Acts 7:20-43 Covers Moses and the wilderness wanderings. God comes to Moses on “holy ground” (v.33), though it is outside of Palestine. God is not confined to Israel.

Acts 7:44-50 The history of the tabernacle and temple from Moses to David and to Solomon. When Moses builds the tabernacle, it is only a pattern Moses saw on Mt.Sinai (v.44). When Solomon built a house for God, God was not confined to any “house made by men”. Stephen cites Isaiah 66:1,2 wrt this. There God forcefully says that he is not confined to Israel, and that his “face” is available without going to the temple.

4.         7:37-43. How do these verses address the place of the law in Israel? 7:51-53 How does this charge follow from his whole speech?

7:39-43. Stephen’s accusers had accused him of “speaking against the law” (6:13), and here is his defence. He says, “I do not disregard the law — it is you who do so.” Here in Acts7:38 Stephen shows that he believes Moses is divinely called and brought God’s words of truth to us. But then Stephen shows that from the very beginning, Israel has failed to obey the law. This happened under Aaron (v.40-42), and continued under the prophets who condemned Israel for their continued disobedience to the law. (In vv.42-43 he quotes Amos.) But Stephen shows from the entire history of Israel that every prophet and leader was persecuted by their own people — Joseph, Moses, David. So there is no way that Israel is going to be saved by obeying the law!

Finally, the charge of Acts 8:51-53 brings the whole argument down to one point. He says that their concern for external rituals (like circumcision) is vain because they are uncircumcised in their hearts — they need,  a new birth. And the evidence is that they have rejected and persecuted Jesus just like all the others. This shows that they cannot possibly obey the law (v.53) unless they get new hearts (v.51). A whole different way of salvation must be found.

The name for Jesus may be chosen carefully, in line with the speech’s argument. He is called the Righteous One, because he is the fulfiller of the law who thus opens the way into God. He is the fulfiller of the law and the temple.

5.  Acts 7:54-8:1. What happens to Stephen to prepare him for death so well? Why does it lead to courage and forgiveness (v.60)? How can we know more of this ourselves?

When Stephen was dragged before a human court, he was condemned unjustly and was about to be executed. But he was “filled with the Holy Spirit” (Acts 7:55). What happened? He saw “Jesus, standing at the right hand of God” (v.56). What was the significance of that? There are other places in the Bible where Jesus is seen seated at the right hand of God (Hebrews 1:3), with “sitting” representing a finished work. But here Jesus is standing. The best guess is that this refers to his work as our Intercessor (Heb.7:25). The Bible speaks of his intercessory work as an ongoing work, in which he stands before the Father as our representative so that we are regarded by God in him.  1 John 2:1 ‘we have an advocate with the Father, one who speaks in our defence — Jesus Christ the Righteous One.’

At the very moment that an earthly court was condemning him, Stephen knew the heavenly court was commending him. At that moment, he got a powerful sight of what he already knew  -  that in Christ we are beautiful in God’s sight and free from condemnation (Col.1:23). He faced his accusers with boldness, calmness, joy (v56) and forgiveness (v60).

To the degree we are aware of Jesus’ work as our advocate, as our righteousness before the Father, we will have courage, love and power. How can this grow in us? There are many answers that will depend on a person’s specific circumstances. But Stephen had these conditions. First, he was daring in witness. God gave him this help because he had stepped out for Christ. Second, he knew the Scripture — he was soaked in it. Third, he “looked” to heaven (v.55). Did he look because he saw something, or did he see something because he had looked? We have to take time to really cry out to God to send the Spirit so that things we know intellectually become things that we spiritually “see”.


Previous
Previous

Acts 15 (Bible Study)

Next
Next

Acts 5,6 (Bible Study)